∎ PDF Free Diana Secrets Lies Nicholas Davies 9781932270211 Books

Diana Secrets Lies Nicholas Davies 9781932270211 Books

Download As PDF : Diana Secrets Lies Nicholas Davies 9781932270211 Books

Diana Secrets Lies Nicholas Davies 9781932270211 Books

Good looking - good. Not good looking bad. And THAT is how shallow people and the biased media judged Prince Charles and Diana. She was NO lady. If he screwed around with Camilla, SHE had affairs with everyone from horse groomers to army officers (5 years of him), security personnel, and bankers (whose wife she harassed from phone calls traced BACK to Buckingham Palace) to soccer players (Diana broke up their young marriage)

Charles married for convenience - he needed an heir. During an interview BEFORE they were married he was asked "Do you love her?" His answer: "Whatever love means" DIANA WAS STANDING RIGHT BESIDE HIM so SHE KNEW this was a marriage of convenience just like the hundreds of royal weddings before. For her to act the victim is a farce. She LIED to Charles by pretending to like everything HE LIKED and even said so in that same interview. She LIED and said she liked fishing, hunting, environmental issues, reintroducing native plants, painting/water colors, reading, etc. Diana followed him around like a bitch dog on the hunt exclaiming everything he did she liked going so far as to wear waders - LOL. BUT, when the ring was on the finger - the truth came out. She was BORED. She like theater, movies, city lights, shopping, crowds - IN SHORT THEY HAD NOTHING IN COMMON. Charles never should have married her.

While he is no genus, she had an IQ so low, she NEVER graduated from high school She was a teacher ASSISTANT - a teacher requires a college degree. Diana did not graduate from high school because she could NOT PASS a single 0 level test in any subject. (to graduate, students have to pass an 0 level test in a lot of subjects like history, math, ect.) Diana even worked as a maid cleaning homes while living in London in an apartment she inherited and Diana had several flat mates who lived with her paying rent to help with the expenses.

And come on!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of mother makes her young son "her confident" telling him everything? Children do NOT need to hear their parent's woes/troubles let alone push Kleenex under the bathroom door to a sniveling Diana. That is plain sick sick - a Mommy Dearest moment if ever there was one. Children do NOT have the emotional maturity to be their mother's confidant. And, hearing Diana sob on about how she hated Charles and his extended family or how Fergie betrayed her also to young William is just plain WRONG.

This book helps balance the scale.


Tags : Diana: Secrets & Lies [Nicholas Davies] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. small novel about 7 onces and is about 6.6 x 4.1 x 1.2 inches,Nicholas Davies,Diana: Secrets & Lies,Ami Books Inc,1932270213,GHT6642KF06242011H9927A,Europe,United Kingdom, Great Britain,Europe - Great Britain - General,BIOGRAPHY & AUTOBIOGRAPHY Royalty,Biography,Biography & Autobiography,Biography Autobiography,BiographyAutobiography,Biography: royalty,British & Irish history: from c 1900 -,European history (ie other than Britain & Ireland),GENERAL,GREAT BRITAIN - HISTORY - 20TH CENTURY,General Adult,HISTORY Europe Great Britain General,Monarchs & royalty,Non-Fiction,Royalty,United States,Women

Diana Secrets Lies Nicholas Davies 9781932270211 Books Reviews

I would thought that someone from the Globe magerzine would wirte this. Many people with Nicholas Davis is trying to make more money from Diana. He already worte many before this one. In his first book, it said about the James Hewitt afair. I like that fact Diana was sleeping with her cokcney bodygard. That was cute. This is in My princess Diana collection. It dosen't bad mouth her like most people think. He just told the truth about her affairs before she diead. I do belive that Diana was a if off with Will Carling. Bloddy good luck to her
This is a very bad book. It contains a lot of lurid information that is given as fact, whereas I saw it as perhaps the "Lies" of the title. Diana was murdered by British secret services. Diana thought Prince Harry's father was really James Hewitt. Prince Philip carried on a long-term affair with Princess Alexandra.

The book is hard to read because of the constant repetition. Information given in one chapter is repeated almost word-for-word in later chapters. And the grammar is horrendous. There are just too many mistakes that a careful editor would not have let pass.

One odd thing. The text has apparently been cleaned up to make it conform to US grammar rules instead of British rules. But I seriously doubt that a Brit in a direct quote would say "dollars" instead of "pounds." And I really doubt that a Frenchman would talk about "miles per hour" instead of "kilometers per hour."

Nobody (except perhaps Prince William) comes out of this with a clean image. Prince Philip comes off the worst, with the Queen coming in a close second. I was surprised at some of the passages that exonerate Camilla. According to this author, she was smeared by Team Diana.

There must be better books about Princess Di. Try to find one of them and avoid this one.
I've had several of Mr. Davies books and found each to contain weak writing, wild speculation and possibly even a hatred/envy for the Princess. This book is no different, he spends lots of time rambling on about her good works and skills and then will rip into the Princess for a variety of things.
I find the title "Diana, Secrets & Lies" to be interesting becasue Davies seems to imply that most of the secrets and lies in the story were Diana's although he often rambles off about some other members of the royal family.
One of the most outrageous things in the book is Davies virtual, near continuous insistence that Prince Harry is James Hewitt's son. He even has the nerve to quote Hewitt denying this 'fact', something I personally don't believe that lowlife would do, he'd want the attention.
The first two reviewers liked the Diana murder conspiracy segment, it is interesting but not very well developed, I'd like more on that one.
Ingrid Seward for all her faults is a much better writer, getting her books instead might prove to be the better investment.
I don't beleive all of this book and for the most part I think it is rubbish. Charles was the one who was unfaithful to Diana and not the other way around. Sure later on she had her affairs - I guess she got tired of sitting around and waiting for an unaffectionate husband. The Spencer's have red hair and Harry could take after them. I don't see how Charles could be king, since he is divorced and he married a divorced woman - double ugly. What he sees in the Rotweiller I don't know, but they seem to be happy together. I really HOPE when William takes the throne he restores the title of HRH to Princess Di. I have AWAYS said Prince Phillip was behind getting Diana killed and I will never believe otherwise. He is a mean person! After I thougt about it I kept the pictures that were in the book and threw the rest in the trash.
I too believe that Nicholas Davies is a little toad who hated the Princess. His book was total crap and it is so obvious he is writing it to get money for himself. Don't waste your money!
Good looking - good. Not good looking bad. And THAT is how shallow people and the biased media judged Prince Charles and Diana. She was NO lady. If he screwed around with Camilla, SHE had affairs with everyone from horse groomers to army officers (5 years of him), security personnel, and bankers (whose wife she harassed from phone calls traced BACK to Buckingham Palace) to soccer players (Diana broke up their young marriage)

Charles married for convenience - he needed an heir. During an interview BEFORE they were married he was asked "Do you love her?" His answer "Whatever love means" DIANA WAS STANDING RIGHT BESIDE HIM so SHE KNEW this was a marriage of convenience just like the hundreds of royal weddings before. For her to act the victim is a farce. She LIED to Charles by pretending to like everything HE LIKED and even said so in that same interview. She LIED and said she liked fishing, hunting, environmental issues, reintroducing native plants, painting/water colors, reading, etc. Diana followed him around like a bitch dog on the hunt exclaiming everything he did she liked going so far as to wear waders - LOL. BUT, when the ring was on the finger - the truth came out. She was BORED. She like theater, movies, city lights, shopping, crowds - IN SHORT THEY HAD NOTHING IN COMMON. Charles never should have married her.

While he is no genus, she had an IQ so low, she NEVER graduated from high school She was a teacher ASSISTANT - a teacher requires a college degree. Diana did not graduate from high school because she could NOT PASS a single 0 level test in any subject. (to graduate, students have to pass an 0 level test in a lot of subjects like history, math, ect.) Diana even worked as a maid cleaning homes while living in London in an apartment she inherited and Diana had several flat mates who lived with her paying rent to help with the expenses.

And come on!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of mother makes her young son "her confident" telling him everything? Children do NOT need to hear their parent's woes/troubles let alone push Kleenex under the bathroom door to a sniveling Diana. That is plain sick sick - a Mommy Dearest moment if ever there was one. Children do NOT have the emotional maturity to be their mother's confidant. And, hearing Diana sob on about how she hated Charles and his extended family or how Fergie betrayed her also to young William is just plain WRONG.

This book helps balance the scale.